FACILITATING OCT COOPERATION The Greater Caribbean This Week
Norman Girvan
Guyana Chronicle
October 13, 2002

Related Links: Articles on The Greater Caribbean This Week
Letters Menu Archival Menu

For 1995-2000 the European Union (EU) allocated 10 million Euros within the European Development Fund (EDF) to support cooperation between their Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) and their regional neighbours. Very little was utilized by the Caribbean OCTs.

The EU/OCT Association Decision of 2001 identifies five kinds of partnerships for regional cooperation involving OCTs. Examples of how this might work are supplied below.

TYPES OF OCT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIPS SUPPORTED BY THE EU

PARTNERSHIP HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE POSSIBLE SUBJECT AREA

OCT - OCT Netherlands Antilles - BVI Inter-island transport

OCT - Neighbouring Africa-Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) or Non-ACP States Cayman - Cuba - Haiti Netherlands Antilles - Venezuela Disaster preparedness

OCTs - ACP States or Most Remote Region Anguilla - St Kitts -St Martin (Guadeloupe) Sustainable Tourism

Regional Org - Regional Org.* CARICOM - ACS Maritime Transport

OCT - Regional Org.* Aruba - ACS Air transport

*Provided that the regional organization includes membership of an OCT, a Most Remote Region or an ACP state .

Sources: Article 16 of Association Decision, and author.

There is no shortage of regional bodies for such cooperation--the Association of Caribbean States (ACS), the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean/Caribbean Development and Cooperation Committee, CARICOM, Cariforum, and the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States are all in the business. All the Caribbean OCTs are eligible for Associate Membership of the ACS. Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles have completed the legal requirements and both will be fully exercising their rights come 2003. Air transport, disaster preparedness and mitigation, trade and sustainable tourism have already been identified by these two countries as areas for regional cooperation through the ACS.

Countries. Population Land Area Per Capita MEMBERSHIP IN REGIONAL ORGANISATIONS

(000's) (Sq.km) Income . CDCC/

2001 1997/99 US ACS ECLAC CARICOM OECS
Dutch Territs.

Aruba 70,007 193 $28,000 Associate Associate Observer -

Neth.Ants. 212,226 960 $11,400 Associate Associate Observer -

Brit Territs.

Anguilla 12,132 91 $8,200 Eligible for Associate Status. Associate Associate Associate

Bermuda 63,503 58.8 $33,000 Eligible for Associate Status. - Observer -

B.V.I. 20,812 150 $16,000 Eligible for Associate Status. Associate Associate Associate

Cayman Islands 35,527 259 $24,500 Eligible for Associate Status. Associate -

Montserrat 7,574 100 $5,000 Eligible for Associate Status. Associate Full Full

Turks&Caicos. 18,122 430 $7,300 Eligible for Associate Status. - Associate -

Sources: World Factbook 2001, Union of International Associations.

Website Sources: htpp://www.CARICOM.org, htpp://www.oecs.org, htpp://www.CARIFORUM.org

The EU-OCT September meeting in Bonaire heard that Cariforum is proposing to make OCTs eligible for associate membership. Interest was also expressed by British OCT’s in ACS associate membership. But it is going to be difficult for the small Caribbean OCTS to service membership in so many regional organisations. The number of meetings and the paperwork overwhelm the limited numbers of staff in their Ministries.

Together with considerable bureaucratic requirements for accessing EU funds, this presents a daunting picture to an OCT that wishes to secure a relatively modest amount for a project with its regional neighbours.

My own view is that the EU, the Caribbean regional organizations and the OCTs will need to work together to come up with simplified methods of regional cooperation tailored to the circumstances of OCTs. These circumstances are different from those in Brussels, Georgetown and Port of Spain.

For instance, participation in regional projects could be de-linked from membership in the regional organisation. Perhaps a simple framework cooperation agreement between the OCT and the regional body might suffice; opening cooperation projects to OCT participation on mutually agreed terms.

And relatively quick-disbursing financing facilities with simplified approval procedures might be considered, giving more authority to the local territorial authorizing officers in charge of managing EDF funds.