Same three year sentence for possession of ten grammes of Cannabis and smuggling eleven pounds of cocaine.
Stabroek News
October 9, 2001

Dear Editor,

Thank you for publishing our letter [albeit much abridged] concerning the plight of Garvin Grumble, jailed for three years by a Berbice magistrate for possession of just ten grammes of cannabis.

Our surprise at the severity of this sentence was later matched by our surprise that no one else seems to have picked up this matter, or seems even to care.

Today (Saturday), however, our surprise knows no bounds. We now read in your pages that a woman caught smuggling five thousand grammes of the hard narcotic, cocaine, has received ... three years jail: the same that poor old Garvin got for his pinch of weed.

So where is the justice? Where are those salt-of-the-earth citizens who not so long ago would have been up in arms (figuratively speaking, we hasten to add) at such a sanctional disparity?

Had Garvin had been a wealthy trader, no doubt he would have had recourse to the best legal counsel, appeals and adjournments until the sentence was reduced or until the matter disappeared - like so many others - never to be heard of again. But being just a grass-root (and stem) man no doubt Grumble will just have to languish in jail for three years for his third-of-an-ounce of cannabis - just like the hard-nosed smuggler of eleven pounds of cocaine.

Again we ask, where is the justice? And again we ask, is there no one in the whole of our dear land who can or will lift a hand to help this unfortunate fellow?

If this were politics no doubt there would be scores of screamers for justice ... but this is not politics, it's just humanity, and thus the voices, it seems, all remain silent.

God help us all.

Yours faithfully,

Peter Pernival-Luck

Manmohan Singh

Alan Segayah

TheLawSociety@aol.com

Editor's note:

The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) (Amendment) Act 1999 contains several important adjustments to the principal act.

Foremost among these are Clause Four which assigns softer penalties in cases where persons are convicted for possession of less than five grammes of cannabis (not applicable to cocaine) and where it is clearly established that the illegal substance was for personal consumption and not trafficking. The maximum penalties are fines of around $6,000 and community service of nine months. The proposed amendments also establish as a special reason for consideration by the magistrate or judge that the guilty person is a child or "young person".